Blog Layout

What’s the point of pay?

Mark Chamberlain • 10 May 2021

Research findings suggest that only 45% of employees think that their pay is appropriate for the job they do, given their responsibilities and achievements, while 36% do not, there is room for improvement. By way of comparison, overall job satisfaction is 64% positive. However, these subjective perceptions of pay are linked to objective amounts of money.

Objective evaluations are based around levels of pay. Subjective assessments are based around assessments of whether ‘this salary is worthy of my contribution’. Research would suggest that both absolute and relative aspects of pay interact significantly.

It’s interesting to note that people earning less than the voluntary living wage typically view their pay as unfair while those earning in excess of this regard their salary as fair. The amount of money they earn is just as important as how they earn it.

However, if you increase levels of pay and benefits it doesn’t necessarily feed through into significant benefits for the company. If you increase pay and benefits, this has only a moderate impact on job satisfaction and a weak impact on enthusiasm, effort and intentions to quit. Albeit we can assume that pay levels do play an important part in getting a person to join a company.

What are the implications of what research would suggest and the insights for how we manage people, including how we reward them?
It doesn’t mean that pay and benefits are not important, but the impact is influenced by other aspects of what makes for a good job, such as terms of employment (permanent, temporary, etc), job design and the nature of work, work-life balance, voice and representation, etc.

This means that it doesn’t matter how good your reward package is, its impact will be challenged if, for instance, employees are not satisfied with their health and well-being at work, the quality of relationships with others, or the opportunities they have in the company to speak directly to mangers, or through their communication channels and forums.

It also indicates where competitive advantage can be found. It’s not through reward and recognition polices themselves, which can be copied, but through how these policies are implemented in ways that support the other people management activity.

Similarly, the effectiveness of a company’s reward package ‘the deal’ will be enhanced if other aspects of people management, such as how jobs and work is designed, are aligned with the company’s reward philosophy, mission and vision, as well as how it puts its reward policies into practice.

In conclusion, the point of pay is that from the company perspective it is a means to an end, rather than an end in itself. It plays a part in supporting the company’s people management practices, while the company’s people management practices play a role in supporting its approach to pay.

by Mark Chamberlain 10 May 2021
For company’s, what are the advantages of segmenting the benefits that they offer to their people or segmenting their people when it comes to communicating the benefit package? Can such an approach help a company better target resources, or might it end up creating dissent and disunity?
by Mark Chamberlain 10 May 2021
Pay transparency, a subject being discussed through numerous platforms, but what is driving this intrigue and how should companies respond?
Share by: